BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

John H[_2_]

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:28:20 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

"John H" wrote in message
...

I wonder, which of the massacres would have been prevented by
universal background checks?

John H.

---------------------------------------

Probably none. But it's just common sense that anyone who wants to
assume the responsibility of gun ownership should be given a basic
background check to make sure they are not a felon or person with
mental disabilities or problems, don't you think? Plus, John, you
were discussing earlier the private transfer of a gun to another
person. Don't you think that as a responsible gun owner you should
have a means to ensure you are not selling your handgun to a criminal
or mental deficient? You mentioned that the seller of a handgun to
you didn't know you from Adam. I think having the ability to ensure
you are not selling to a nut it's part of the responsibility of owning
a firearm.

I can go along with the only people allowed to vote, have firearms, receive welfare, and
other taxpayer provided monies and support being US citizens who are not felons.

I saw you slip voting and welfare in there!

I think that might be a good trade-off. Background checks for voting and welfare (with appropriate
ID of course) and background checks for gun buyers.

That could even up the score somewhat.

John H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!