In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:30:07 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:57 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

A handgun he was offering for sa;le.
You are ignoring him bragging about beating down a guy and wanting to
beat him again because "he didn't bleed 'nuff."
He HAD a gun he was trying to sell illegally, just not with him at the
moment (he may have actually sold it by then)

Means nothing in the case of Zimmerman.

Trayvonn was a drug dealing, gun dealing thug based on his phone dump.
I am not sure why you are defending him.
I guess it is because he wasn't in your neighborhood.

I tend to defend those who haven't been proven guilty in a court of law.

Has Zimmerman been proven guilty in a court of law ... no. He has been
convicted in your mind tho.

No he hasn't and you can't show me one thing I've said that would make
you think so.

Why do you continue to defend Zimmerman, a KNOWN liar, who has been
KNOWN to be violent and arrested for it? He's lied several times about
this VERY CASE and you still think he's telling the truth??


Zimmerman was involved with over 50 different incidents where he
called the police and there was never any violence, threats or
confrontations. The two incidents you refer to were a long time ago.

Zimmerman was also in incidents where there WAS violence and he was
arrested for it. Why do you continue to not answer about that?

The Travonn things are very recent and show an increasing degree of
violent activities.
Zimmernan turned his life around, Martin was sinking into the
"gangsta" world as fast as he could.
Bear in mind, he would not have even been in Sanford if he was not
kicked out of school for being a thug.

Bear in mind that Zimmerman has told lies about this case. Funny, you
don't answer to the negative things about Zimmerman, you simply delete
them and carry on your vigilante approach about a kid who is dead and
can't defend himself.