On Friday, 10 May 2013 14:25:06 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On 5/10/2013 7:14 AM, BAR wrote:

In article , says...



In article ,

says...



In article , says...



On Wed, 08 May 2013 16:12:47 -0400, wrote:



On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:25:12 -0700, jps wrote:



In Afghanistan, religious extremists commit murder with their own

hands. In Merika, religious idiots have others handle their sins.



Our government uses robots to execute people (plus anyone else within

50 meters) that they used to arrest and take to Gitmo.



Is that better?



I would think death penalty opponents would be up in arms about this.

Death without a trial for suspicion of terrorism?



Nope, not a word when a Democrat is in the White House.



As a whole, I bet Anwar al-Awlaki would have rather been water boarded

a few times and be in Guantanamo with a chance to get out. They would

have a pretty hard time finding him guilty of anything in an American

court. Speech, even anti-American speech is still protected.



All that said, I still think he should have been killed ... but I

would kill the remaining bomber too.



Death penalty should be taken up by the religious before us atheist

"libruls" don't ya think?



The good news is that more states are either passing legislation

against or refusing to put people to death. It's not a deterrent,

never has been never will be.



But, the killing of babies in the womb is just a woman's choice.



You really should read more on the physical sciences instead of what FOX

tells you.



You forget, I have a daughter who was a very very pre-mature baby. When she was born her

nipples on her breasts hadn't formed yet, the formed within a week. But, she was alive and is

now 19 years old.





My daughter also was saved from the womb and certain death 7 weeks

early... Now she is a motocross champion...



What championship did she win?

Yeah...you'd think Snottie would have boasted and proclaimed that championship across the land.if and when it happened.