On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:17:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?


Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up
with their guns and other guys.

I thought gay was good! Here you go making disparaging comments about same again.

John H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!