View Single Post
  #54   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
F.O.A.D. F.O.A.D. is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default F.O.A.D. Defined

On 5/8/13 8:35 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 5/8/2013 12:40 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 5/7/2013 9:04 PM, BAR wrote:

F.O.A.D. wrote:


I just love the work I have to do in HTML.

Another lie from the deadbeat.

Look, Harry thinks he knows something!


He should let us know when he can sit down at a text editor and come out
with a fully functional webpage like my lady does...

------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know why anyone would be creating a webpage in HTML anymore.


What language would you use to carry the engines and display the site???

===================================

I was referring to generating a website using HTML code directly and
exclusively, without benefit of canned website creation software.
I use canned software now but occasionally modify the resultant code for
specific purposes or reasons. The last full website I did was for the
guitar shop. It was a hack job done using Yahoo's "Sitebuilder". At
one point I started redoing it in a much nicer (I thought) format using
another program with a lot of fancy features but the customers
complained. They liked the simplicity of the original design and it's
ease of use. So, I've left it alone.



One of the sites I designed and manage started out as a "canned"
wordpress design, but I've modified it so much over the years that it
isn't recognizeable anymore as wordpress. I learned HTML a long time
ago, and still use it.

In the last few years, I've noticed a number of sites that I used to
visit for info so "crapped up" with "features" that the sites, to me, at
least, are too complex and slow. There's a lot to be said for simplicity
on websites.