BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_3_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 3 May 2013 13:03:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 3 May 2013 09:45:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 2 May 2013 16:58:12 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

The code sections mandate electronic switching devices and they will
require that 3d wire we were talking about.
Try to keep up

There is NOTHING, and I repeat NOTHING in the code exclusive to CFL's OR
anything that is a direct cause of CFL's. NOTHING.

Bull****. If you could still use incandescents the 2 wire occupancy
detectors would work fine. The energy code mandates CFLs or LEDS, the
government is phasing out incandescents as we speak and the only
answer is a 3 wire device.

Bull****. You can not, have not and will not show me ANYTHING in the
current codes that mandate 3 wire occupancy detectors because of CFL's.

They work fine with incandescents. They don't work with CFLs or LEDs.
What else do you need to know.

So..... you are saying the only reason for the code change is because of
CFL's and LED's???? Really?

The code says "to provide for a neutral conductor to complete the
circuit for electronic lighting controls". That is not necessary if
you have an incandescent load. Maybe you are just to dumb to make the
connection or you are just ****ing with me for some personal reason
but I am done.

None of the above. Your notion that it's just for CFL's and LED's is
bull**** and further, you know it is! As you say, it is "to provide for
a neutral conductor..." It isn't "necessary" for a CFL any more than it
is for an incandescent light! Period. And you can't show me how/where it
is, because it isn't happening.