"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 4/27/13 4:45 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:17:54 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Gee, who was it here that said that it takes more energy to make
ethanol
than it produces?

===

I did, and it is true if you add in all of the agricultural energy
such as fertilizer production, etc.

It was true, not anymore.

---------------------------------------------

Well, halleluiah and praise be to the corn gods. Cheap perpetual
energy. Oh, and by the way, the science community better get busy
re-writing the laws of physics.



I posit that "perpetual" energy really isn't relevant. If you were an
early settler to this continent, and spent a day cutting down a tree
and
sawing it into firewood, you had a source of energy for your cooking
and
heating fires that would last a long, long time, and would certainly
provide more energy in terms of BTUs and other measurements than you
expended.

---------------------------------

The energy expended by the settler is not all the energy involved.
It's only that used in the harvesting of the tree.

iBoater previously claimed that it takes less than a gallon of fossil
fuel to produce a gallon of ethanol. He's now claiming that all the
energy consumed in the growing, harvesting and production of the corn
(or sugar) for a gallon of ethanol is less than the energy the gallon
of ethanol will produce as a fuel.

I say nonsense.