On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:20:16 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/13/13 12:17 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:56:45 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/13/13 11:04 AM, wrote:

This is why you can't believe most of what media writers write.

That is clearly a cap and ball pistol.


The real point was that it was a deadly firearm you can purchase without
dealing with an FFL.

You can buy a crossbow too, what's your point?
The federal law says that muzzle loader is not a "firearm".

You folks are certainly moving the goal posts a lot. First it was
assault weapons with high capacity magazines, now it is a flintlock
musket.
I can put a ball bearing in a capped pipe with a firecracker (or a few
hundred match heads) in it and do some damage too.
You really have to decide where you draw the line.


I think all firearms transactions should go through an FFL, with the
purchaser "background checked."

Simple enough.

That would have stopped the massacres?

That would slow down the murders in PG County?

That would have prevented your 'special circumstances'?

Here's what I think: ESAD is full of it!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.