BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

F.O.A.D.

On 4/13/13 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:33:42 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

On 4/13/2013 12:22 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:49:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/12/13 4:24 PM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...

Hilary Clinton backed the invasion of Iraq against the opinion of her
constituency, the voters of New York, and that cost her the presidency. She
will founder on the same rock again.

Yeah, right, Mrs. Clinton so turned off her constituents in New York
State that she won 67% of the popular vote when she sought re-election,
compared to 55% in her first term.

Where do you righties get these nonsense ideas?

At the moment, if she decides she wants the nomination, it is hers, and
there isn't a Republican at the moment who could defeat her. It's along
way to the nomination and election, of course, so let the right-wing
craziness continue.

Hillary is a neocon and the neocons are pro Israel.
Why wouldn't she do well in New York?

What's the alternative? Progressive?
Def: Becoming more seve describes a disease that becomes more
widespread or severe over time.

If we don't come up with some sibilance of justice for the
Palestinians we are going to be doomed to another century of war
there.

Agreed, but I am not sure "justice" for the Palestinians will calm down
the crazies among them.