|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
|
|
NRA Specials
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:02:41 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says...
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Go back and read about the Massacheusetts ratification convention.
------------------------------------------------
I fail to see what it has to do with background checks to purchase a
gun in 2013.
Things have changed a bit since 1788 and changes to laws are sometimes
required. For example, I'd like to see a uniform travel law
established for permitted, legal gun owners. There's no Federal law
restricting inter-state travel but each state has it's own set of
rules and reciprocity agreements. I can't travel from MA to SC to
visit my son with a gun in my car without violating the law in several
states. In many ways I think traveling down RT 95 through New York,
New Jersey, and other areas south is probably more dangerous than some
war zones if you happen to be forced to stop in the wrong places.
Uniform travel law? If we are moving to national laws we should just go to the point where
each state has to recognize each other states CCP, concealed carry permits, without
modificaiton, exception or modification. If I am originally permitted in one state that
should be accepted by all states whenever I enter those states or when I move from state to
state. Why would one right be andy different from any other right?
So, you don't believe in state's rights or you do? You don't when it
comes to guns, but you do when it comes to other things? Your "logic"
is so twisted not even a pretzel could sort it out.
|