On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:46:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.

We were both there for the same reason, ESAD, to support the war.

Thanks.

Now, how about the stuff you embarrassingly snipped?

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber is capable of being shot
*instantly*.

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.