BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:22:25 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:56:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Small town in northern Georgia, the conservatives there are trying to
pass a law that makes household gun ownership mandatory, and this has
already been a conservative made law in a county in Georgia. But, this
got me to thinking, the conservatives are all about LESS LAWS, at least
those laws that they don't like, and here they are telling everyone you
MUST own a gun....

That is old news. Kennesaw Georgia has had that law for 20 years.
There is an exception for anyone who doesn't want to, so it is just
symbolic.

This isn't in Kennesaw, it's in Nelson, GA, and if you look, I stated
that there is another county in GA that has a similar law, and that
county is where Kennesaw is located. Still, I want to know how these
types of new laws are ok for the right wing, when they whine about too
many laws. I don't need some politician telling me that I need to have a
gun in my home.

Which part of "you don't have to if you don't want to" do you have
trouble understanding?
This is a symbolic piece of legislation with a loophole for anyone who
is against the idea.

Nope, it's a law stating that you must have a firearm in your home.

I think it is silly but I don't see it as being that intrusive on
anyone's rights.

Really? You don't mind someone telling you you must own a firearm? Well,
then would you mind if someone told you you COULDN'T own one?

It was done as a response to other laws in blue states that prohibit
owning a gun. They are just making a statement.

What states say that you can't own a gun?

It is Georgia, why do you care?

You've once again totally missed the point. I'll ask again. Why is it
fine with the right wing to tell people they must own a gun if they are
a homeowner, but then turn around and whine when a law is passed that
they don't like and their rebuttal is that they don't need more laws
telling them what to and what not to do?