On 2/27/2013 1:44 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Feb 27, 1:31 pm, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 13:25:02 UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:38:53 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Boxer said he has

evidence to corroborate the former employees' allegations, but stopped

short of saying the beers had been independently tested.

That would seem to be the first step. Checking the alcohol content is

a trivial process. I wonder why they did not try to get independent

analysis.

I always assumed the bottle cost more than the beer and the contents

was pennies to them anyway

I know nothing about beer brewing or the expense attached to commercial

beer brewing. I do know the few times I "taste-tested" Bud's U.S.

brands, I thought they were ****y. A decade or so ago, I was at a

pavilion in Orlando, maybe at SeaWorld, where the makers of Bud were

offering free samples of all their beers. It was very hot that day, and

I got in line a few times. I didn't like any of the offerings.

It's not a snob thing. I'm not much of a beer drinker. If I have a beer,

and I have a choice, I'll pick a Mexican or Japanese beer. I did have a

favorite "local" beer from Mexico, which is the only place I've ever had

one, but I read somewhere the brand was "absorbed" by a bigger brand in

that country.

Funny...way back in the day we used to laugh at the little yanke sailors who'd get buzzed off a few of our beers.
At that time 'merican beer was ****y and ours... a man's ale supposidly a couple percent more alcohol.

The only " ****ing " you do, is in the Depends that you wear due to
old age incontinence.

At east now, he has a legitimate excuse for peeing his pants.