In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:08:23 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:19:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

I really do not feel like digging through a couple hundred Trayvon
Martin posts for quotes but it is encouraging that now you agree
Trayvon did present a credible threat of bodily harm. We are making
progress.

Right....

Yes I am

Show me.

OK

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...ot-620x410.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...immerman-6.jpg

And that proves that *I* said, as you originally stated, that *I* said
that an unarmed man is not a threat how? You're trying really hard to
deny that you accused me of saying something that I never, ever said,
that's for sure.

OK
So you now agree Travon Martin could have been an imminent threat to
Zimmerman and he had a right to defend himself.

You really can't have this both ways.

No, never said that. You really DON'T understand, do you? Let's try
this. Not every man is capable "bodily harm". But, some are. Simple
enough? You are saying that *I* said things that simply I have not. When
I asked a direct question, "Where did I say that unarmed men are
harmless", you're reply was "Trayvon Martin". That is a lie, I never
said that.