|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,370
|
|
Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
On 1/27/13 10:06 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/27/2013 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:
When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it
In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.
Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.
What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?
NFA firearms have been involved in virtually zero crime.
It's the MO for the progressives.. Make everything about everything...
Just like if a mass shooting with hand guns (like the first reports
said, and all the facts point to), and make it about Long guns that were
still in the trunk of the car .. All because the pistol ban is coming
later:O
D'oh. You don't need a full auto firearm to "take advantage" of a
suppressor, **** for brains, and, in fact, it wasn't the point here.
The point was that the NRA is pimping for suppressor manufacturers, and
it isn't a stretch to envision you or someone like you shooting your way
into a school with a semi auto rifle and suppressor or a 9 mm and
suppressor and killing your way through a classroom, making a lot less
noise than you would with a non suppressed firearm.
|