View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
ESAD ESAD is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,370
Default Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...

On 1/26/13 4:44 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:37:30 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:23:20 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:54:01 -0500,
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you mean this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sile...atest_big_lie/


If you are a terrorist, the sound of the gun is just part of the
terror.
Making a suppressor is so trivial that I doubt the law is that
effective anyway. You can register one for $200 if legality is your
thing and you are allowed to make your own without an FFL license..
see BATF Form .

If you are into expediency the 2 liter bottle is a serviceable
suppressor. Better is the 1.5" PVC pipe, stuffed with milk bottle tops
and a little steel wool. on the muzzle end.

Sounds like you're confusing flash suppressor with silencer.


Not at all.

Without actually fingering the guy I can say I have seen the PVC pipe
trick on a bull barrel Ruger MK 1.
It is an impressive reduction in report.
The 2 liter trick is just anecdotal.


I would call that a silencer as opposed to a flash suppressor, which is what's found on the M-16 for
example.


Salmonbait

--

'Ignorance'...the conservative answer to everything of importance!



Suppressor can be used as a term to describe a device that minimizes
sound or flash or both.