BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On 1/24/2013 9:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/24/2013 9:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

This from the idiot that wants to have a retired cop with a gun in a
school, so if a shooter comes in, he can provide "cover fire" in a
school full of kids!

Yup, I do... and you still can't come up with one good reason why that
would be worse than what we have now. All you have is your harryisms...LOL!

I can come up with several reasons, moron.

1. Cover fire would likely kill as many or more kids than a shooter.

Doubt it. Most of these shooters kill themselves as soon as they are
confronted by anybody with a weapon. A shot or two toward a brick wall
would probably finish most of them.

Please give the data to back up your absurd statement.

2. Who says that the very person you hire to have a loaded weapon in the
school doesn't go off of his rocker and start a shooting rampage?

Odds are better a retired cop has less chance after years of training
and scrutiny, than an average citizen.

Please give the data to show these odds.

3. What if this person was overtaken by a person or persons, he'd just
be giving the perpetrator more fire power.

These shooters generally come armed, why take a chance of trying to
"overtake" an armed police officer?

Happens all of the time.

4. Teaching kids that violence is a good thing is never a good thing.

Teaching kids to defend themselves, is always a good thing...

Right, teach THEM how to be an aggressive asshole with a gun, maybe THEY
will grow up to massacre a school full of little kids.