On 1/24/2013 9:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On 1/24/2013 9:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
This from the idiot that wants to have a retired cop with a gun in a
school, so if a shooter comes in, he can provide "cover fire" in a
school full of kids!
Yup, I do... and you still can't come up with one good reason why that
would be worse than what we have now. All you have is your harryisms...LOL!
I can come up with several reasons, moron.
1. Cover fire would likely kill as many or more kids than a shooter.
Doubt it. Most of these shooters kill themselves as soon as they are
confronted by anybody with a weapon. A shot or two toward a brick wall
would probably finish most of them.
2. Who says that the very person you hire to have a loaded weapon in the
school doesn't go off of his rocker and start a shooting rampage?
Odds are better a retired cop has less chance after years of training
and scrutiny, than an average citizen.
3. What if this person was overtaken by a person or persons, he'd just
be giving the perpetrator more fire power.
These shooters generally come armed, why take a chance of trying to
"overtake" an armed police officer?
4. Teaching kids that violence is a good thing is never a good thing.
Teaching kids to defend themselves, is always a good thing...