View Single Post
  #31   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
iBoaterer[_2_] iBoaterer[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Bend over and cough...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:54:40 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:10:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

What does that have to do with your assertion there ghettos are a result
of affirmative action?

Who ever said affirmative action?

"War on poverty" same thing. You are wrong though, and wont' admit it.

Are you saying affirmative action and welfare are the same thing?

I will let your liberal buddies bitch slap you for that.


Now where the hell did "welfare" come into this????


The war on poverty was a welfare program
Affirmative action is a civil rights thing involving educational,
employment preferences and predated the war on poverty by 6 or 7
years.
A rich woman or minority still can benefit from affirmative action.

But, once again, YOU
said that ghettos were a result of the war on poverty. You are, and were
wrong.


There were always pockets of poverty in big cities. They got much
bigger, gobbling up larger swaths of the city after the government
started throwing money at them.
What has the war on poverty actually fixed. There are more poor people
now than there were in 1968 and they are multi generational,
unemployed families that are trapped in the cycle of poverty.
They make more money on public assistance than they could make working
at any job they are qualified for.,


As I said, your posit that ghettos were the result of the war on poverty
was wrong.