BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - Another great example of right wing free enterprise without government interaction.

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:55:36 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

I am not sure why FEMA writes any insurance on barrier islands and
flood plains. It is basically just rich people welfare.
Maybe they should have a "one strike and you are out" policy. The tax
payers will rebuild you once, or just buy you out if you want but
after that the lot is blacklisted.

Yes, indeed. A barrier island is what it is, it's not a place to be
inhabited. People think although it's low that it's stable and if they
build on piles high enough, life is good, but a good storm, barrier
island is gone or shifted or moved.

I have always believed the big concrete buildings on the barrier
islands might end up being island themselves.
Since the 70s and 80s, the pilings might be 40 or 50 feet down so they
will be there but the sand around the building could be gone.

The trouble with the sand being gone is the pilings are using skin
friction to hold the buildings down in a wind event. Without the sand,
no skin friction, and the wind pushes the building over. Not as common
with concrete tilt up or precast, but with pre-engineered metal
buildings, which are built as light as possible, you need that skin
friction, or if shallow foundations they need to be massive enough to
keep the wind from blowing the building over or away!

People who move to Florida and settle right on the water would do well
to take a lesson from a couple of generations of old Floridians. You
don't see them build right on the beach!!!

I am about 5 miles from the beach, behind 2 miles of mangroves. The
surge from that direction will be blunted by nature. I have US41 and
I75 to the east that will stop sheet flow from the everglades. It is a
very effective flood control dam.

Mangroves are good for a LOT of reasons, one is that it will keep the
sand in place.