Thread
:
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
View Single Post
#
56
posted to rec.boats
iBoaterer[_2_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article ,
says...
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:25:28 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:47:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
Yeah, I'm sure, since you first bitched and whined like a friggin' baby
that nothing was being done to help Sandy victims. Then when I pointed
out WHY, because Boehner wouldn't allow a vote to get something done,
you instantly turned to FOX's answer that it was because of pork. Well,
the pork is still there, Boehner let the Republicans vote for it. So,
the question is, are you okay with it now? If so, what has changed? If
not, are you going to vote against those Republicans in office for the
pork they allowed?
The bill they passed was not the same bill as the one they didn't. Not
even close but you are too lazy or lack the intellectual
curiosity/ability to find that out.
Do I really have to look that one up for you too?
The point is there is still much, much pork in the bill, but now that's
okay right? And no, you don't look up much of anything, you position
like Scotty's is usually made up in your head
OK I looked it up and, sa usual you are full of ****
This is the text of the bill that passed, No Alaska fisheries, No roof
on the Smithsonian or any of the other crap in the 100 page H.R.1
H.R.41 -- To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National
Flood Insurance Program. (Introduced in House - IH)
HR 41 IH
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 41
To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood
Insurance Program.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 3, 2013
Mr. GARRETT (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN,
Mr. LANCE, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. HANNA, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs.
CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr.
CROWLEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Ms. MENG,
Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. TONKO, and Mr.
BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the
Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood
Insurance Program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL
FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.
(a) Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968
(42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking `$20,725,000,000' and
inserting `$30,425,000,000'.
(b) The amount provided by this section is designated by the
Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) of S.
Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget
for fiscal year 2010, and as an emergency pursuant to section 4(g) of
the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)).
Oh, ****, are you really trying to tell people here that THAT is the
bill in it's entirety???? Really????
Reply With Quote
iBoaterer[_2_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by iBoaterer[_2_]