BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - For those who think arming teachers is the answer...

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article om,
says...

On 12/20/2012 8:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 12/20/12 7:46 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/20/2012 2:13 AM, thumper wrote:
On 12/19/2012 7:47 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/19/2012 10:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 12/18/2012 9:53 PM, Califbill wrote:
ESAD wrote:
Let's not forget that Nadal Hassan shot 43 people, 13 fatally, at
Fort
Hood, a facility filled with armed and trained people. Approximately
214
shots were fired (Hassan had another 177 rounds on him when
captured). He
was attacked by three different soldiers, all of whom he shot. It
was
not
until a civilian police officer arrived some time later that Hassan
was
shot and wounded. If the army can't stop a guy like this, how is a
kindergarten teacher supposed to?

It was a gun control area. Nobody was allowed to carry weapons. The
people were trained, but not armed. Most bases in the states have
the
weapons in the armory. I was stationed on an airbase, Travis, that
had APs
at the gates and the only other armed people were the guards out on
B52
line.

That's interesting. All those trained people. More guns = more
safety... why don't they trust them?

Maybe they were there for other reasons, why burden them?

Like the janitors and lunch ladies you want to arm?

Are you really as dense as harry, or just protecting the union slugs too?

Awwww, poor little **** Snotty, who couldn't hang onto a "union job" he
lost decades ago, is still ****ed off about it.

How does one get fired from a union job? I thought it was impossible.

Then you sure as hell don't know what you are talking about, just like
Scotty.