On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:21:53 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"GuzzisRule" wrote in message
.. .


But, I have no problem with laws banning the 'assault style weapon' -
providing they can be defined.
You didn't address the questions I posted with the pictures.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Your first picture was that of a typical rifle.
The second was a tiny thumbnail of a magazine (I think).

What was the question?

Crap. I deleted it. But I believe it asked if that 'typical rifle' should be considered an assault
weapon. Your reply, calling it a typical rifle, answered the question. The second picture showed a
30-round clip which can be purchased for that rifle, which is the same caliber as the one used in
CT.

The point was that outlawing 'assault weapons' wouldn't prevent an individual from performing the
same deed without it. Other weapons would work just as well.

But, to appease those who think the style of the weapon is the problem, I have no problem with
outlawing them. I don't like rifles with plastic stocks anyway. 'Made by Mattel' was never high on
my list of desirables.