Thread
:
Snickering Snotty
View Single Post
#
25
posted to rec.boats
BAR[_2_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Snickering Snotty
In article ,
says...
"GuzzisRule" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:43:39 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
But statistics indicate that this is *not* a growing epidemic or
upward trend. There were unfortunately more that occurred in the
1980's and 1990's. We just didn't hear as much about them as we hear
today.
I've also heard similar statistics presented on one of our local radio
stations. The statistics make
us look better.
However, I'd have no problem with the banning of assault weapons.
Target practice and hunting can
both be done with other types of rifles. The question will then be,
"What constitutes an assault
weapon?"
------------------------------------------
"Justwait" made a comment that caused me to think about this. I
think his definitions of guns could be developed into a reasonably
simple category system of what is available for purchase and ownership
by private citizens and what is reserved for military and police use.
For private citizens:
Firearms (handguns and rifles/shotguns) specifically designed for
target practice and competition. No more than 7-10 round capacity.
Firearms (rifles and shotguns) designed specifically for hunting.
No more than 5-10 rounds.
Firearms designed for personal/home defense. Includes handguns with
no more than 7-10 round capacity. Concealed carry permits allowed
based on background check.
Non-functioning firearms as collectibles/display pieces. These can
include military type weapons but must be permanently disabled.
For Law Enforcement and Military:
Firearms and weapons designed for both defensive and offensive use.
Automatic and semi-automatic with unlimited round capacity.
The days of private citizens being concerned about arming to the teeth
to protect themselves from their own government are long over.
That interpretation of the 2nd Ammendent is obsolete. Private
citizens don't need high capacity, offensive weapons.
Why should they have greater firepower than us. When the US Constitution
was written, debated and adopted did not distinguish between military
assault style weapons and regular weapons.
Reply With Quote
BAR[_2_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by BAR[_2_]