View Single Post
  #89   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JustWait[_2_] JustWait[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Default Scarborough gets it right

On 12/18/2012 4:21 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:06:23 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:07:11 -0500, ESAD wrote:



On 12/18/12 1:41 PM,
wrote:



It is clear there was something wrong with these people's thinking


processes. I am sure we will be hearing a lot more psychobabble as


this story goes on.


There has to be something that separates a responsible gun owner like


you from this waste of oxygen.






I think it is a little different when lay people try to psychoanalyze


someone who has committed a horrific act such as the one in Newtown. The


few professional psychotherapists I have seen interviewed on TV are


rightly reluctant to play that game in the absence of a face to face


evaluation and, of course, that isn't going to happen. Some of the


"symptoms" and behaviors attributed to the shooter suggest


schizophrenia. If that is the case, it manifests itself in many


different ways, and it is silly to think in the absence of evidence the


shooter did what he did for "fame," or to be somebody, or even to "get


even." We may never know what was on his mind. According to my wife, it


is "very interesting" that he killed his mother. Matricide is not


common, even among the severely mentally ill. Particide is a bit more


common, especially where the father has sexually abused his child.






I am not sure "professionals" have a much better grip on why people do
these things.


Child psychologists have gotten us into a lot of the child rearing problems we're in now. The feel good, no red ink, no score keeping bull**** has caused many of the issues we're seeing in the newer generations.

He may have simply shot mom because she was trying to keep him from
taking her guns ... but there certainly could have been other factors.


It's all a guess. I have to wonder why he targeted the school where she worked and kids she worked with. Did he think she loved them more than she loved him?


Yes...

He was certainly "nuts".