View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Meyer[_2_] Meyer[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default No increase in mass killings

On 12/16/2012 8:33 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:41:41 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

"There is no pattern, there is no increase," says criminologist James Allen Fox of Boston's Northeastern University, who has been studying the subject since the 1980s, spurred by a rash of mass shootings in post offices.

Grant Duwe, a criminologist with the Minnesota Department of Corrections who has written a history of mass murders in America, said that while mass shootings rose between the 1960s and the 1990s, they actually dropped in the 2000s. And mass killings actually reached their peak in 1929, according to his data. He estimates that there were 32 in the 1980s, 42 in the 1990s and 26 in the first decade of the century.

Chances of being killed in a mass shooting, he says, are probably no greater than being struck by lightning.

Still, he understands the public perception - and extensive media coverage - when mass shootings occur in places like malls and schools. "There is this feeling that could have been me. It makes it so much more frightening."

-----------

It was a tragedy, and our hearts go out to the victims and their families.

However, it seems that the sky is not falling, no matter what our resident naysayers spout. Our mass media makes it seem so much worse now, eh?


Witness the brutal, knife, hatchet, and machete attacks on children in
China.

Bottom line is that children (and others) need protection wherever and
whenever they are vulnerable. Armed school resource officers,
teachers, and administrators would have made this tragedy much less
sever. You will never prevent attacks, but you can make them more of a
suicide than a murder.

Love the clever way you used the word sever.