On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:21:27 -0700, jps wrote:


You're as dense as ever. The argument in Washington was that the
stimulus wouldn't create jobs, which was the basis of Ryan's voting
against it.

I guess these dumb ****s would have given back the $288 billion in tax
cuts the stimulus bill contained.

But when the money was made available, Ryan was among those who argued
that giving it to his constituents would create jobs.

But I'm sure you're too ****ing stupid to notice the difference between
No Child and this, where states are dependent on Federal funding to
deliver mandated education.

**** for brains, you are.