BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Califbill

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.

----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks
like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a
weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in
the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.

But the alleged passionate christian conservatives here think you should
be able to shoot and kill someone without any justification. I wonder
how these alleged christian conservatives would like it if someone shot
their child for doing something stupid?

-------------------------------
Most everyone would feel bad their son was killed. Even if the kid was in
the middle of a robbery at the local stop and rob with a shotgun in his
hands. Does not mean the kid did not deserve to be eliminated from the gene
pool.