BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Meyer[_2_]

On 9/30/2012 1:56 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:19:08 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 9/30/2012 11:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

There is certainly a pile of circumstantial EVIDENCE here that will
undoubtedly be used to steer an investigation which could lead to a
charge of some sort and possibly a trial.
(See if Loogy can pick up on the subtle reference to a stupid remark he
made recently)

A trial for what? Shooting someone who is coming at you with a knife?

Well maybe in Connecticut.

Yes maybe. Ct. is a Castle Doctrine state.