View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,rec.motorcycles.dirt
John Doe John Doe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 16
Default OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"

Congratulations, it's a troll...

BAR screw you.com wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giga news.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.gig anews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.gigane ws.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:47:54 -0500
From: BAR screw you.com
Newsgroups: rec.boats,rec.motorcycles,rec.motorcycles.dirt
Subject: OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:47:20 -0400
Message-ID: MPG.2a8602e6d8e97036ed5 news.giganews.com
References: jvfnkl$n92$1 dont-email.me 5g4o189ive74k0c8lf1bck738sek04n50v 4ax.com jvh7bb$vfs$1 dont-email.me
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Lines: 50
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-CGl+q0o050vuNscYgphEEfuvUz8aqP06/uNTs6GsfxjoeXKa97ad8pR5Gv6cq5FCKY1i8T/SL5DHfQp!eOW6hmfuEqRykiscZVQIMgpEOn8Ie4ksN4cNucDot BGe2TLHTaiYXEFVEp4yoXbL3Lt+
X-Complaints-To: abuse giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2675
Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org rec.boats:210015 rec.motorcycles:99518 rec.motorcycles.dirt:18767

In article jvh7bb$vfs$1 dont-email.me, jdoe usenetlove.invalid says...

David T. Ashley dashley gmail.com wrote:

John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I'm looking at gas/petrol stabilizers, Sea Foam and STA-BIL.

On their FAQ page, both of them refer to a "2-stroke" engine as
a "2-cycle" engine.

Uhg.

It's only semantics, but you would think that those
manufacturers would know the difference between a "stroke" and a
"cycle".

Per Merriam-Webster...

stroke:
the movement in either direction of a mechanical part (as a
piston) having a reciprocating motion; also : the distance of
such movement
cycle:
a course or series of events or operations that recur
regularly and usually lead back to the starting point

"2-stroke" "4-stroke" engine

About 3,270,000 results

"2-cycle" "4-cycle" engine

About 427,000 results (0.48 seconds)

Using "cycle" is not a big deal for casual speakers, but besides
being less popular, it's semantical nonsense.


I believe that using "4-stroke cycle" is more correct than
either 4-stroke or 4-cycle. It takes 4 strokes to make a cycle.


I'm not talking about technical correctness, I'm referring to
a significant semantical blunder.

What matters is the number of strokes per cycle. The number of
cycles is irrelevant.


At least you aren't calling them motors.