On 7/29/12 8:48 AM, BAR wrote:
In article 5f25f29b-2433-4e89-9ce4-
, says...

On Jul 28, 5:44 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/28/12 5:06 PM, John H. wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:25:25 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 7/22/12 3:18 PM, John H. wrote:
Did you and your buddy ever come up with a suggestion of the .45 I'm going to buy? Tried to call,
but no answer.

CZ 97B if you are man enough.

I've qualified with the M1911A1 about a dozen times. You reckon the CZ 97B requires more of a man?
How many times have you qualified with a .45, Harry?

I'm just a range shooter, John. I've never shot any Vietnamese people.
I've found the CZ's to be more accurate in 9mm and .45 ACP than the run
of the mill 1911's.

The military still like the.45ACP.They just ordered a couple million
dollars worth of them

I saw that last night. The USMC is dumping the 9mm for the 1911 .45.

http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gears...c-orders-4036-
m45-cqbp-pistols/




The logic of the choice escapes me. The new pistol has a capacity of
only seven rounds. If the marine corp thought it needed a pistol with
more stopping power than a 9mm (19-round mags easily available), it
could have gone with a pistol that fires .40. And it looks like the
taxpayers will be paying about $1800 a pistol...what a rip.

Oh, well, it's the military. Wasting money is a high priority there.