Thread: This is a good read about Zimmerman
View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
iBoaterer[_2_] iBoaterer[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default This is a good read about Zimmerman
In article om,
says...

On 7/23/2012 3:55 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/23/2012 3:37 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/23/2012 3:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
 says...

On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
 says...

On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
 says...

On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
 says...

On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
 says...

On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article
m,
 says...

On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
 says...

On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be-

convicted-and-this-is-why/


It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog

How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on
current Florida
law?

All of them. A precedent is a precedent.


I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool

How so, specifically?

How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not
have been
written and passed yet?

No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder
trial.

That's not what you said.
Words have meaning.

I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman,
this would
be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been
charged
with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking?

Show us the precedent in question.

I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question....

Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy.

You didn't look at the link I posted??????

I hardly ever do.

Well then, that answers why you are ignorant.

One does not become enlightened by following your links. Sorry dude.

I read the link. It was a hysterical internet blogger, being typically
imaginative and hitting all the talking points the left has made up
about this tradgedy... Short on facts, but understandable why kevin
would think it was a "good read"... LOL!

You are full of ****!!! It gave precedent after precedent about how
Zimmerman will be found guilty. You couldn't have read it, or at least
you didn't understand what you read. And I'm not kevin, idiot.

Legal precedent is ALL fact, you moron!

No sir it isn't, it's a ruling.

It's still all fact.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote