BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - Obviously, credibility is not an issue...

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:50:32 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 7/20/12 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:09:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman
did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim
self-defense.

That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting
out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all
Corey is alleging he did in the indictment

Well the, why did he get out of the car? AND you're forgetting the phone
conversation Martin was having.

He got out of the car to WATCH the person he called the cops on so he
could point him out when they got there.
Is getting out of your car a crime now? Corey seems to think so.

Bull****, he confronted Martin. His girlfriend heard it. Is looking at a
car a crime now? That's why you seem to think Zimmerman was justified in
killing Martin.

What was the first thing the girlfriend said she heard between them?

Hint, it was Martin addressing Zimmerman.

Martin was shot because he was beating the **** out of Zimmerman. I am
not sure what the law is where you live but aggravated battery is a
forcible felony in Florida and a bystander could have legally shot
Martin if they came up on him beating Zimmerman's head on the
concrete.

Is that what Rush told you to say?

That is what the law says.

The law says that Martin was "beating the **** out of Zimmerman'??? What
about Zimmerman's assault of Martin?