|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
|
|
Because it says so...
In article , says...
On 7/17/2012 10:35 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/17/2012 7:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jul 17, 8:41 pm, thumper wrote:
On 7/17/2012 4:08 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jul 17, 10:48 am, thumper wrote:
Undoubtedly there are *many* things that science will never "prove".
That doesn't make supernatural explanations valid.
You're right. but "supernatural explanations" shouldn't be discounted
because of such.
If one had *ever* been verified I would consider it.
I'm sure you would consider it. Maybe not believe it, but yes, you'd
consider it.
I'm quite willing to change my mind with credible evidence and care much
more what is true than what feels good.
When you pigeon hole faith like you do, nobody is really going to take
you seriously enough to share anyway. Besides, you already have made up
your mind....
Do you mean the way you "pigeon hole" progressives, liberals, agnostics
etc. every day here, bigot?
|