On 7/17/2012 12:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:16 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/17/2012 11:48 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/17/2012 5:45 AM, Tim wrote:

And what marvels me is those who feel that if science can't prove it,
then there is (nor can not be ) any other explanation.

Undoubtedly there are *many* things that science will never "prove".
That doesn't make supernatural explanations valid.


As valid as anything else until it's ruled out.


You're shifting the burden of proof. Show one demonstrated supernatural
phenomenon.

David Copperfield could probably make you a believer. Or at the very
worst, a skeptic.