Thread
:
something for Harry to keep his eye on
View Single Post
#
35
posted to rec.boats
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,027
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:50:55 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On 7/6/2012 12:00 PM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
In article ,
lid says...
On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote:
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text
I hope you realize that was a facetious label that
unfortunately stuck
with popular media.
The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or
genesis
of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity.
It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle".
Cite?
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news
Are you really saying that a boson is God?
Did you really think that?
Well, it appears so.
Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have.
You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught
you, with a cite, that it is upper-case.
That is all.
Well, then it IS God!
That depends on how you define IS.
My answer is "dishonest" Alex... snerk
Please tell me what is dishonest about my statement. If you capitalize a
noun it is a proper noun, ie: a name. So, what God is it?
Whatever God you believe in.
In your case, the God of Irrationality.
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]