On 7/6/2012 12:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

In article , lid says...

On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote:
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text




I hope you realize that was a facetious label that
unfortunately stuck
with popular media.

The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or
genesis
of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity.

It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle".

Cite?

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news




Are you really saying that a boson is God?

Did you really think that?

Well, it appears so.

Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have.

You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught
you, with a cite, that it is upper-case.

That is all.


The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g.
Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina?

Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather
the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is
intended.
In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended.



Disrespect for a superstition? You betcha. I also have no respect about
spilling salt or stepping over a crack in the sidewalk. As soon as one
of you bozos posts proof of the existence of a "creator," I'll read it.
And I mean proof, not "belief" or more superstition.

You respect my beliefs and I'll respect yours. Deal?