On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , lid says...

On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote:
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text

I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck
with popular media.

The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis
of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity.

It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle".

Cite?

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news

Are you really saying that a boson is God?

Did you really think that?

Well, it appears so.

Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have.

You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case.

That is all.

Well, then it IS God!

That depends on how you define IS.