On 6/26/12 8:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/26/2012 8:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:46:32 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

Somebody please explain to me why with at least 100 years worth of
energy right here under the ground in the US, we don't concentrate more
on making it clean enough to use it?

===

Because it has become clear to just about everyone that fossil fuels
are not viable over the long term -- depletion, pollution, CO2, etc.

We need to find a better way. Fusion has been dangling out there at
the end of the rainbow for a long time (60+ years). That's one of
the things that needs more work. Home solar is another one that's
getting a lot closer. Solar panels are now less than $1/watt which
is almost at the point where it begins to make economic sense, at
least in sunny climates.


Of course "are not viable over the long term"... I know that and that's
why we need to spend that time looking for "viable" alternatives. We
have plenty of time though, don't have to do it on one election cycle.
We can take our time and get it right, and in the mean time, still find
better and cleaner ways to use what we have.... I guess my sarcasm
missed you but I am not against new technology at all, as long as it's
not technology we already know won't work... And certainly I don't want
it to turn into just more Global Taxing for nothing...


Dip**** JustWait channels dip**** Palin.