On 6/2/12 5:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:13 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 11:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 10:13 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since
Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today, they
own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children,
that's
great huh?

Keeps harry feelin' secure...


Uh, we don't have a Florida-like "stand your ground" law, little dummy.
If, however, a violent little turd like you breaks into a house down
here, it is unlikely anymore than the prosecutors will claim the victims
had an "obligation to retreat." In other words, when you break into a
house down here, you'll likely be shot. The question is, how good a shot
is your intended victim? Will they shoot you dead or just use a shotgun
to blow off your legs from the knees down?

You should think about that before you engage in home invasion, little
putz.

Wow, you sure talk tough for a guy who obviously wouldn't have the balls
to pull the trigger... LOL!

True, harry was too chicken to serve.

Too chicken to serve? You mean in the U.S. military during our country's
moronic, ill-conceived, useless and losing war against the people of
Vietnam?

I wasn't chicken, and I wasn't dumb enough to volunteer. I also wasn't
drafted. What would "serving" have proved? That I didn't give a damn
about killing people who had never done anything to me or my country
until we invaded it?

Can't *any* of you righties actually think?