On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:24:14 -0400, John H.
wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 08:13:43 -0400, oscar
wrote:


On Tue, 22 May 2012 07:51:24 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:
On 5/22/12 7:16 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:35:36 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 21 May 2012 16:22:12 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

On May 21, 3:28 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 07:36:49 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:


http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2012/...dy-wayne-white.
..
.

Interesting article but I have no idea whether the issues
raised have
merit or not.

I don't think any "tournament" is sporting. I fail to see
why
anybody
catches more than they can eat. Piggish.

I thought those tournaments were catch- weigh- release?

That is even more inhumane. Wear the fish out, injure it,
beat
the
crap out of it putting it in a live well, hold it out of the
water for
an extended period, and then hanging it to weigh it, before
it is
dumped back in the water. Most of those mishandled fish
probably
end
up shark bait.

If it's a tournament where the biggest is the winner, then
word
will be spread as to the size of
fish caught. The little ones will be immediately released.
Only
the few in contention will be put in
a tank and weighed.

At the bass tournaments on the Potomac, the fish must be able
to
swim away by itself to be counted
in the weighing. Granted, it's still rough on the fish, but
probably not as bad as being eaten.
Other than the occasional bull shark, the bass don't have much
to
worry about - except our beloved
snakeheads, of course.




Thank goodness those Potomac bass have an ichthyologist and
advocate as
knowledgeable as John Herring speaking up about what worries
them.

I agree. You should be pleased that someone other than the all
knowing, all seeing Harriet
Krause is willing to spread knowledge among the unwashd masses.


Pay attention. I'll show you how easy it is to ignore Harry rather
than feed him.

O...K... Eyes on you. :-)