BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 02 May 2012 21:04:00 -0700, thumper wrote:

On 5/2/2012 10:50 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:42:08 -0700, wrote:

On 5/2/2012 5:14 AM, BAR wrote:
In , lid says...

On 5/1/2012 12:40 PM, wrote:

In fact the physical attack is not even the legal test, only that
Zimmerman feared he was going to be harmed.

What a stupid law.

You are supposed to die as all good victims should.

I've survived quite a while without a gun including Detroit and Chicago.
If I killed every time I felt fear of harm there would be more than a
few needless deaths.

The real question is whether there was an imminent threat.

You just said it was "only that Zimmerman feared he was going to be harmed."

There is nothing more imminent that an attack in progress.

How many of
these thugs punched you in the nose, knocked you down and banged your
head on the concrete? (simply because they thought you were watching
them)

I would not be surprised if you have a number for that but the big
city philosophy is that you are supposed to tolerate crime, make a
report to the police and assume nobody will ever be arrested for it.

Some of us moved here because we don't want to live like that.

I don't tolerate crime any more than you do, including vigilante murder.

The state still has not proved that is what happened

Because it hasn't gone to court yet.

If
Harry wants to boycott Florida, do it.
All the time he is bragging about his license to carry in Maryland.
I am still waiting to hear what the justification he used on the
application was.

Who cares...?

Anyone who wants to point out hypocrisy.