In article 14595606.1743.1335974640414.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@vbbh3, says...

On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 11:13:19 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012 10:40:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:



A lie??? Here, now apologize....
April 29, 9:09 PM Greg wrote:

"The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that
it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the
burden of proof."

Now read the transcript, no one ever said that. They said they had no
evidence of a couple of very cut and dry concerns, they did NOT say they
had no evidence that it didn't happen that way.

"That way" refers to breaking Zimmerman's story.
The significant points are about whether Zimmerman was returning to
his truck when he was confronted, who initiated the confrontation and
who started the fight. The state has said they don't have evidence
about all 3 of those issues.

An owner on private property has every legal right to watch a
suspected trespasser until the police arrive. That is all Zimmerman
says he was doing and the state has presented no evidence otherwise.

Give it up, Greg. You could hand the boy a pencil and lead him to a piece of paper with two big dots on it, and he still couldn't connect them. Doesn't have the mental capacity.

Oh, man, talking to you and Scott is like trying to make sense to a
chimpanzee!