BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article , says...

On 5/1/2012 8:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:37:05 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I find it interesting that you can jump to the conclusion that
Zimmerman was an "asshole" who shot Martin for no reason but if
someone says Martin was a pot smoking thief with a chip on his
shoulder you say we are racists who are jumping to conclusions simply
based on his THREE suspensions from school and the things they found
in his back pack. .

Martin had no police arrest record. Zimmerman has an arrest record for
violence. Zimmerman was stalking the kid, probably confronted him, and
then pulled out his pistol.

Zimmerman had the same charge laid on him as Skip Gates had from the
Cambridge Police, Resisting arrest and both were dropped.

As for the "confrontation", as I posted a few notes ago, the sworn
testimony of the lead detective is that they had no evidence about who
started the confrontation, that Zimmerman was not heading back to his
truck or who threw the first punch. That is all you and your buddies
making stories up with no facts..

No one is making up stories except you and Scotty. First you said the
"state said they have no evidence".

Nope, never said it, you are just stringing folks along again fool...

What is wrong is the misleading by
elimination. There are specific things that the state said they had no
information about YET.

If this was a black separatist gang who shot an armored car guard you
would be telling us we are jumping to conclusions without any evidence
but this is a white guy.

*I* certainly wouldn't.

Oh, yes he did, and you agreed. If I show you the exact paragraph where
he said that, and the reply where you agreed, will you finally shut your
pie hole?