BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article , says...

On 4/30/2012 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:38:01 -0400, wrote:

The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that
it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the
burden of proof.

Cite?

If you are going to play the game, you really have to watch the news.
They had the bail hearing on TV in it's entirety.
The fat cop with the badge said he had no knowledge of how the fight
started or who initiated it.

Does this finally put any credibility of the plum on this issue, out to
pasture? I have been telling you all for a week he didn't watch the
hearing, didn't look it up, and doesn't even care really as long as he
can get you going... You do know you are talking to the plum, who left
and changed his handle when you stopped talking to him last time, right???

Okay, moron listen. There is a HUGE difference in saying that they had
no evidence of "who started the fight" and coming in here and trying to
say that the state said they "had no evidence" in the entire case.