BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

JustWait[_2_]

On 4/30/2012 5:37 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/30/12 5:21 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:24:09 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/30/12 4:10 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:16:49 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal
test.

And Martin had the legal right to be walking around at night.

They were both on firm legal grounds until Martin punched Zimmerman in
the nose.

Was that alleged event before or after the asshole pulled a gun on him?

I find it interesting that you can jump to the conclusion that
Zimmerman was an "asshole" who shot Martin for no reason but if
someone says Martin was a pot smoking thief with a chip on his
shoulder you say we are racists who are jumping to conclusions simply
based on his THREE suspensions from school and the things they found
in his back pack. .

Martin had no police arrest record. Zimmerman has an arrest record for
violence. Zimmerman was stalking the kid, probably confronted him, and
then pulled out his pistol.

If you listen to the transcripts (snerk) the judge seems to differ with
the whole "violence" notion.. He dismissed all of those "arrests" as
college folly, and wrote them off in reference to the case. But of
course harry, we don't expect you to accept that cause, well, you are a
liar...