BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:25:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:16:56 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Evidently in Zimmerman's case long enough to get cold-cocked, have the guy get on top of you and bounce your head off the ground a couple of times.

Gee, you say that like you have facts to back that up! What are they?
Hospital reports? Nope.

The Z family says they have medical records

Hearsay.

Witnesses? Nope.
There are 2 who put Z on top, the 2 who saw the fight

From far away. How credible are these witnesses you hold so highly? Has
the prosecution had a chance to examine and ascertain just what they
know and how they know it? Have they done studies to determine whether
or not from where they were, at night, tell exactly what was going on?

Hearsay? Yep!
Nope

Then show me the real evidence that exonerates Zimmerman, it seems to be
missing.

Perhaps you were absent the day they taught civics in civics class.
The defense doesn't have to prove anything. It is up to the
prosecution to prove their case.

I didn't say that the defense has to prove anything. What I asked you to
show me is real evidence that exonerates Zimmerman because it was you
who has said all along that he's innocent.

The defendant is innocent until proved guilty.

Yes, he is, but that doesn't mean that there was cover up by the Sanford
PD.

The state will have to come up with evidence that Zimmerman's story is
not true. They have not shown any so far.

Of course they haven't. The trial hasn't started yet.

There is still a very good chance that this gets tossed at the
immunity hearing and it never gets to a jury.

And there is just as good of a chance that he'll be convicted.