On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:00:33 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:07:38 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/17/12 9:02 AM, wrote:

"Asking a question is not assault."


Not answering a question is not asking to be assaulted.

It appears Martin answered the question with a punch in the nose. THAT
is assault and battery. When Zimmerman's head was bounced on the
pavement it was aggravated assault.
That is a forcible felony in Florida and a bystander could have shot
Martin at that point. (using the old law)

I think Martin was standing his ground,

You "think", but you don't know. That's the problem, you're opinion is not based on any facts.

and that's what you're supposed
to do in Florida. You state the above like it's facts and it's not, it's
hearsay, and not only that, barely plausible. How much are you going to
let a guy pummel you if you have a gun?

Evidently in Zimmerman's case long enough to get cold-cocked, have the guy get on top of you and bounce your head off the ground a couple of times.


This all comes down to breaking Zimmerman's story and Corey has not
said she can do that, at least not in the charging document.
She is trying to make a case that Zimmerman got out of his truck,
intending to shoot Martin "with a depraved mind". If so, why did he
call the cops?

Because he's a cop wannabe vigilante.

Hearsay and pure conjecture.


We better get our head around the idea that Zimmerman is going to beat
this charge. It might get tossed in the immunity hearing. As Bill
Maher said the other night, store owners in Miami are already buying
the plywood to board up their stores.
It is going to be a long hot summer and if that happens, say hi to
President Romney.

There you go again, certain that Zimmerman is innocent because of
what??? Oh, FOX of course!

"Beat this charge" does not equal "innocent". I'll bet even FOX would tell you that!