BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:57:28 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:10:59 -0700, thumper wrote:

On 4/14/2012 5:36 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:42:11 -0700, wrote:

I think this is biased interpretation. Granted the choice of words was
unfortunate but the intended meaning of the dispatcher was quite clear.
Don't follow.

You have to take words at what they are, not what they might be.

If they tell you that you don't "need" to eat all your peas, it
doesn't mean you can't.

Willful ignorance. The point was crystal clear.

Yes it was crystal clear that the government was not going to protect
Zimmerman's safety when Martin attacked him

How do you know Martin attacked Zimmerman? Oh, forgot, you blindly
choose to believe Zimmerman.

There is nobody else who knows what actually happened. Until I
actually hear another credible witness who actually saw what happened,
I am left with Zimmerman's story.
The first eye witness so far did not even look until the guy with the
white shirt had the guy in the red shirt on the ground.
The woman who said the guy in red was on top did not look until after
the gun shot.

How about the girlfriend? How about the lady who heard the ruckus and
claims it was all about Zimmerman? Oh, they don't count, because like
you said earlier, those blacks have an attitude.