On 4/11/2012 2:23 PM, North Star wrote:
On Apr 11, 2:40 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 4/11/12 1:11 PM, jps wrote:







On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:12 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.

If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker.

Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept
sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is
wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is
right there fanning the flames...

"US Justice Dept sanctioned hit" makes you look insane or stupid.

He *is* both insane and stupid.

Make that CRIMINALLY insane!

You and Harry are such a nice fit. Like a pair of gloves.
snicker-snort-snerk. :-) don't ignore the smiley